Input
Output

A man and his mother are in a car accident. The mother sadly dies. The man is rushed to the ER. When the doctor sees him, he says, "I can't operate on this man. He's my son!"



How is this possible?


The explanation is that the doctor is actually the man's daughter.

The key detail is that the doctor says "I can't operate on this man. He's my son!" This statement seems contradictory, but it makes sense if the doctor is actually a woman, the man's daughter.

The scenario describes a car accident involving a man and his mother. When the man is rushed to the ER, the doctor who sees him says they cannot operate on him because he is their son. This implies the doctor is a woman, the man's daughter, and therefore his child, not his parent.

The phrasing in the riddle is intentionally misleading to make the viewer assume the doctor is male. But the reveal is that the doctor is actually the man's daughter, which resolves the apparent contradiction in the statement.


Evaluation

Evaluation ID
cae6ebe0-1b38-467d-b7fe-478960b816ac
Created
March 21, 2024

Evaluation Rating

Binary Pass/Fail
Fail
Score
75
Additional Feedback
The submitted answer provides a different explanation than the expert answer, suggesting that the doctor is the man's daughter instead of father. However, the explanation is well articulated and takes into account the misdirection in the phrasing of the riddle. The key detail of the doctor being a woman, the man's daughter, is highlighted effectively.
Factual Consistency
D: there is a disagreement between the submitted answer and the expert answer
Raw Output
{
  "choices": [
    {
      "message": {
        "role": "assistant",
        "content": "The explanation is that the doctor is actually the man's daughter.\n\nThe key detail is that the doctor says \"I can't operate on this man. He's my son!\" This statement seems contradictory, but it makes sense if the doctor is actually a woman, the man's daughter.\n\nThe scenario describes a car accident involving a man and his mother. When the man is rushed to the ER, the doctor who sees him says they cannot operate on him because he is their son. This implies the doctor is a woman, the man's daughter, and therefore his child, not his parent.\n\nThe phrasing in the riddle is intentionally misleading to make the viewer assume the doctor is male. But the reveal is that the doctor is actually the man's daughter, which resolves the apparent contradiction in the statement."
      },
      "finish_reason": "end_turn"
    }
  ],
  "model": "anthropic/claude-3-haiku",
  "id": "gen-aTZZAPRnZm9p1GsUpWydsxjHX3TY",
  "object": "chat.completion",
  "created": 1711039305,
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 61,
    "completion_tokens": 174,
    "total_tokens": 235,
    "total_cost": 0.00023275
  }
}
Raw Rating Output
{
  "choices": [
    {
      "index": 0,
      "message": {
        "role": "assistant",
        "content": null,
        "tool_calls": [
          {
            "id": "call_sfogKkrd4GSDrU2Kh7vACeTT",
            "type": "function",
            "function": {
              "name": "get_eval_rating",
              "arguments": "{\"binary_pass_fail\":false,\"score_out_of_100\":75,\"additional_feedback\":\"The submitted answer provides a different explanation than the expert answer, suggesting that the doctor is the man's daughter instead of father. However, the explanation is well articulated and takes into account the misdirection in the phrasing of the riddle. The key detail of the doctor being a woman, the man's daughter, is highlighted effectively.\",\"factual_consistency\":\"D\"}"
            }
          }
        ]
      },
      "logprobs": null,
      "finish_reason": "tool_calls"
    }
  ],
  "model": "openai/gpt-3.5-turbo-0125",
  "id": "gen-ZK7WV59CetSDoRzz0Nyxx0a5UOoC",
  "object": "chat.completion",
  "created": 1711039308,
  "usage": {
    "prompt_tokens": 571,
    "completion_tokens": 102,
    "total_tokens": 673,
    "total_cost": 0.0004385
  }
}